**There are many links in this document. If on a laptop-scrolling over text or image will reveal it is linked to an outside resource. If looking on a phone ore tablet, it is mostly the text in bold and almost all images. There are many sections, and an overwhelming amount of information to consider and research on your own. It is a document still in progress, and it’s resources will be updated and re-referenced as the months roll on. Scroll away!

In Considering Risk to Benefit of Taking the Covid-19 "Vaccine"

When considering risk of serious illness from Covid-19 (the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, a coronavirus) how likely am I to get seriously ill? How likely am I to die? 

It depends where I live. How old I am. What the treatment protocols are in my health care facility, if I have underlying health conditions. If I have health insurance (USA).  IFR (infection-fatality rate) = (COVID Deaths / COVID Infections)

Sources: www.worldometer.com, BC Covid-Dashboard  and Covid-19 Ontario 

* data on sources are not all the way to the date that data was collected for this table  ** outcome reporting has either never happened or has not happened yet. Many asymptomatic “lab test positive” cases will not report to their final income  *** there are still 3,044,371 active cases in France that are not closed   **** data from the BC Health Covid Dashboard   ***** data from https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data

  • 3.61% of people tested, tested positive and became a “case”
  • 2.58% of confirmed “cases” died
  • 92.73% of confirmed cases recovered
  • 0.093% of tested people died (93 people in 100,000)
  • 0.06% of the entire population of Canada died of Covid-19. (60 in 100,000)
  • note: some cases are not “closed”. Some cases are “unresolved”

CLICK – Coronavirus: COVID Deaths In U.S. By Age, Race

Note: in the USA health insurance remittance/claims, if the billable ICD-code Uo7.1 is present on the death certificate, the hospital gets $35,000 -$60,000. *source still being researched

Case Fatality Rates are in sharp decline – Good News! Worldwide (1.75%) and in Canada (1.26%)

How effective will the vaccine be in preventing me from getting Covid-19 or transmitting Covid-19?

There are still ongoing trials to determine this. There are no valid claims by the drug companies that the vaccine will make me immune to the virus. I can still get the virus. The companies do claim, that they “hope” that symptoms will be less severe, and require lower hospitalizations. I will still have to wear a mask, social distance, and not be able to gather in large groups.

Is the vaccine safe?

These vaccines are unlike any other. They use mRNA “technology”.  They do not fall in the definition of vaccine as they do not provide immunization. mRNA (gene therapy) is still an “experimental” technology in regards to stopping SARS-CoV-2, and it is still unknown how they will affect future human health. These vaccines currently do NOT have FDA approval. They are being used through Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in Canada, USA and the UK. India and South Africa have rejected some manufacturer’s products for EUA because they are under-tested in their own population.  No vaccine has ever been created in this short of time.  Vaccines usually take 7-10 years to develop and test their safety. The human candidates in trials were under the age of 70, had with no known underlying health conditions (all “healthy”) as per FDA candidate requirements. No pregnant women were part of any trial.

Every day, reports are coming in of “severe adverse reactions” in the news, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website (which is only 1% of all real events). CDC is changing directives for severe anaphylaxis, numbers are climbing for deaths and permanent disability and hospitalizations.  News reports around the world of frail, elderly people in nursing homes, and healthy young doctors and nurses dying either minutes after or within 24-72 hours after receiving the vaccine.

The manufacturers Pfizer and Moderna and the CDC all state that anyone with an allergy to PEG (polyethylene glycol or polysorbate) or any other history of anaphylaxis, hives, or allergies to food should NOT take the vaccine.  They direct that vaccines should be administered where equipment and staff to deal with possible life-threatening allergic reactions should be present.

Cunundrum ... Conclusion

If my chances of getting seriously ill or even dying from Covid-19 are so small, and if I take this experimental, under-tested gene therapy which doesn’t even give me immunity to the virus, and could possibly cause an acute allergic reaction, or a future unknown immune-compromised disease, and if after taking the vaccine nothing is going to change in terms of freedom of movement, mandatory mask wearing regulations and social distancing, then what’s the point? The risk of taking the vaccine, in my view, outweighs the benefit, so why gamble with the unknown.  With successful studies and treatment protocols like prophylaxis therapies with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, or ivermectin available with indisputable beneficial results in peer reviewed studies, there is no reason to participate in a vaccine program that is rushed, under-tested, and now highly politicized. In fact, it could be very detrimental to my immune system, which I feel is strong and intact currently, and I will continue to support it through good diet, supplements, exercise and sleep, and reducing my stress levels and inflammation.

Before You CLICK AWAY from this Document Visit My Top Must “Click” Links

Hopefully, you clicked on some of the links embed in the dialog above. If this Data Collection Research Document is already too overwhelming, I urge you to at least consider my top links (below) to help you determine your risk / benefit analysis regarding getting severely ill or dying from COVID-19 to having informed consent regarding possibly taking the experimental genome therapy mRNA “vaccine”.

  1. America’s Frontline Doctors Dr. Simone Gold and many other videos and research *IF YOU WATCH JUST ONE VIDEO, WATCH THIS ONE
  2. Frontline Covid Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC)
    Dr. Pierre Kory Testifies to Senate Committee about Ivermectin, Dec. 8, 2020 – WATCH THE VIDEO TESTIMONY (Be sure to watch until the very end)
  3. IF YOU ARE AFRAID OF GETTING COVID AND YOU ARE IN THE HIGH RISK GROUP, OR IF YOU GET COVID you can share the info in the following link with your Doctor :  I-MASK Protocol
  4. Dr. Lee Merritt: Explains how mRNA vaccines work
  5. Media Blackout: Moderna’s FDA Report Lists 13 Total Deaths, 6 In Vaccine Group, 7 In Placebo –  Dec 18 2021
  6. The Nuremberg Code (1947): The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.

Canada and Covid

As of Feb 19 2021 :

  • 837,497 Covid-19 cases in Canada (Total Tests 23,371,443)
  • 21,498 Deaths
  • 783,412 Recovered
  • 2.57% of people “lab positive” cases actually die
  • 37,942,107 people in Canada
  • 0.06% of the entire population actually die from this “Pandemic”

The large number of deaths in Canada are among Nursing Home residents with other underlying diseases (co-morbidities), and the majority of deaths happened in March and April last year (2020) in Ontario and Quebec nursing homes.

Canada’s “National Shame”: Covid-19 in Nursing Homes – 7/7/2020

All countries, including Canada, seem to have “flattened the curve” months ago:  source: www.worldometer.info

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

The chart below is from February 19 2021  https://www.pandata.org/

COVID-19 VACCINE INFORMATION

CDC (Centre For Disease Control-USA) definition of Vaccine:

  • Vaccine:  A suspension of live (usually attenuated) or inactivated microorganisms (e.g. bacteria or viruses) or fractions thereof administered to induce immunity and prevent infectious diseases and their sequelae. Some vaccines contain highly defined antigens (e.g., the polysaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae type b or the surface antigen of hepatitis B); others have antigens that are complex or incompletely defined (e.g. Bordetella pertussis antigens or live attenuated viruses). https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/terms/glossary.html

Moderna’s “Platform” (not a vaccine…gene therapy. A medicine.)

FACT: No COVID-19 “vaccine” has been APPROVED by the FDA – It has been given an Emergency Use Administration (EUA) only. https://www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/

FACT: All liability on the makers of these vaccines have been nullified in the USA until 2024 and in the UK forever. No present or future lawsuit can ever be filled if the recipient is harmed or injured or killed by these vaccines. (Moderna calls them “medicines”)

FACT: No company has EVER been successful at making a Coronavirus Vaccine. All studies and lab work lasted many, many years (some, of course, continue today) and all have resulted in deaths and injury in animal trials.

“Conclusions: These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.”

FACT: Moderna’s Initial Phase 1 trial included only 40 people! 

  • “We conducted a phase 1, dose-escalation, open-label trial including 45 healthy adults, 18 to 55 years of age, who received two vaccinations, 28 days apart, with mRNA-1273 in a dose of 25 μg, 100 μg, or 250 μg. There were 15 participants in each dose group.” ……. and three participants (21%) in the 250-μg dose group reported one or more severe adverse events.”
    (see Supplemental: and then search for the word “severe” ctrl F or open apple F) This article was published on July 14, 2020 –
  • Moderna later added to the trial 40 more people between 55-70 Moderna’s PHASE 1 STUDY – Safety and Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 Vaccine in Older Adults – September 29, 2020 –  “We conducted a phase 1, dose-escalation, open-label trial of a messenger RNA vaccine, mRNA-1273, which encodes the stabilized prefusion SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S-2P) in healthy adults. The trial was expanded to include 40 older adults, who were stratified according to age (56 to 70 years or ≥71 years). All the participants were assigned sequentially to receive two doses of either 25 μg or 100 μg of vaccine administered 28 days apart.”

    MRNA-1273 VACCINE – The mRNA-1273 vaccine was codeveloped by researchers at the NIAID Vaccine Research Center and Moderna in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This vaccine encodes a stabilized version of the SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike glycoprotein trimer, S-2P, which has been modified to include two proline substitutions at the top of the central helix in the S2 subunit. The mRNA is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles at a concentration of 0.5 mg per milliliter and diluted with normal saline to achieve the final target vaccine concentrations.

     STUDY OVERSIGHT – The NIAID served as the trial sponsor and made all decisions regarding the study design and implementation.”

  • note: I could not find the Phase II Trial results.

Who is the Director of NIAID? Who is funding these trials and making all the decisions?

  • answer: Dr Anthony Fauci and his “2021 Strategic Partners” (Gifters to this official 501c3 Non-profit organization) AstraZeneca, Janssen Therapeutics, Sanofi Pasteur, Merck & Co., Inc., Seqirus, Inc. USA, Bavarian Nordic, VBI Vaccines, Inc.

FACT: FDA requirements for test subjects (all have to be healthy, no underlying conditions)
* I could not find the results of wider trials on their website, but continuing trials can be found here: The Continuing Clinical Studies and Trials Covid-19 

FACT: The first people getting this “investigational medicine” are the most elderly, frail and with the most underlying poor health conditions (the very group that they never did trials on) https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55045639

Phase 1 – Direct Prevention Of Mortality And Supporting The NHS And Social Care System

How do vaccine effectiveness studies differ from vaccine efficacy studies?
from the CDC Website: “Vaccine efficacy refers to vaccine protection measured in RCTs (randomized controlled trials) usually under optimal conditions where vaccine storage and delivery are monitored and participants are usually healthy. Vaccine effectiveness refers to vaccine protection measured in observational studies that include people with underlying medical conditions who have been administered vaccines by different health care providers under real-world conditions.” So when they talk about the Covid-19 Vaccine “Effectiveness”  it includes their healthy volunteer participants in their trials.

WHAT DOES THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL (CDC) SAY ABOUT THE COVID-VACCINE ?

INFORMATION FOR HEALTHCARE WORKERS AND PATIENTS

*PLEASE CLICK ON THE HEADINGS TO VIEW THE INFORMATION DIRECTLY ON THE CDC WEBSITE

DECEMBER 19 2020 – A CDC Report was made about risks of Anaphylaxis with 112,807 First dose registrants experiencing 3,150 “Health Impact Events” (2.8%) 

JANUARY 21 2021 CDC Releases the Interim Considerations: Preparing for the Potential Management of Anaphylaxis After COVID-19 Vaccination  

AS OF FEB 10 2021 – Interim considerations: preparing for the potential management of anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination  

  • Appendix A: Triage of persons presenting for mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (outlines that if you have had any allergic reactions to any injectables or had anaphylaxis due to allergies then vaccination is contraindicated) Also read the “Contraindications and Precautions” section.
  • Appendix-B:  Ingredients included in Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and Appendix C: Potential characteristics of allergic reactions, vasovagal reactions, and vaccine side effects following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. As of January 21, 2021, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are the only currently available vaccines in the United States that contain PEG. Medications that contain PEG and/or polysorbate are also described in the supplementary materials of Stone CA, et al.

Local Reactions, Systemic Reactions, Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events: Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine – 

Immediate hypersensitivity to polyethylene glycols and polysorbates: more common than we have recognized.” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 7.5 (2019): 1533-1540. 

  • “…Depending on vaccine product (Pfizer vs. Moderna), age group, and vaccine dose, approximately 80–89% of vaccinated persons develop at least one local symptom and 55–83% develop at least one systemic symptom following vaccination.”
  • “In clinical trials, hypersensitivity-related adverse events were observed in 0.63% of participants who received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and 1.5% of participants who received the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, compared to 0.51% and 1.1%, respectively, in the placebo groups. Anaphylaxis following vaccination was not observed in the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines clinical trials. However, anaphylactic reactions have been reported following receipt of mRNA vaccines outside of clinical trials.”
  • “The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has issued interim recommendations for the use of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States.”
  • Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Currently Authorized in the United States  

Fact Sheet For Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Of The Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine To Prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) 

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS

*click on the headings for more information

PRE VACCINE QUESTIONNAIRE are you getting something like this from your healthcare provider?

People Allergic To Polysorbate Should Not Get The Covid 19 Vaccine 

Immediate Hypersensitivity to Polyethylene Glycols and Polysorbates: More Common Than We Have Recognized

Hypersensitivity to Polyethylene Glycols & Polysorbates (it’s a real thing) 
“two patients in our dedicated drug allergy clinic who had anaphylaxis after receiving injectable steroid medications and when trying to take their ‘prep’ for colonoscopies,” explains Dr. Stone. The main ingredient (PEG 3350) in the preps was also present in the steroids to which the patients reacted.”

VACCINE INGREDIENTS:

IS IT SAFE? IS IT EFFECTIVE?

VAERS – United States – a National Vaccine Injury Reporting system run by the CDC
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System – https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

Canada has CAEFISS but the data is not in real time – there is a form you can fill out if one has an adverse reaction.

The United Kingdom has The Yellow Card Scheme for reporting adverse events. The REPORT from the Pfizer vaccine shots from Dec 9 – Jan 31 ’21  HERE *blindness is a newly reported adverse effect

VAERS how-to video (Jan 13 2021)

NOTE: A study from 12/01/07 to 09/30/10 found only 1% of vaccine adverse events gets reported to the VAERS database.
Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP:VAERS) a report

  • “In addition, ESP: VAERS investigators participated on a panel to explore the perspective of clinicians, electronic health record (EHR) vendors, the pharmaceutical industry, and the FDA towards systems that use proactive, automated adverse event reporting. Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. Low reporting rates preclude or slow the identification of “problem” drugs and vaccines that endanger public health.”

MY PERSONAL DATA SEARCH ON VAERS

*The VAERS data is updated every Friday.

Parameters: VAERS ID / Adverse Events Description / All Symptoms / Covid-19 / All Manufacturers / All Locations / All Ages / All Genders
Feb 1, 2021:     254 Death
Feb 12, 2021:  653 Death
Feb 19 2021:   929 Death
March 8 2021: 1265 Deadth
Feb 8, 2021:   1011 Death / Life-Threatening / Permanent Disability
Feb 12, 2021: 1288 Death / Life-Threatening / Permanent Disability
Feb 19 2021:  1794 Death / Life-Threatening / Permanent Disability
March 8 2021: 2524 Death / Life-Threatening / Permanent Disability

Below is a segment of what the data search results look like when searching “deaths”. The number on the left is the VAERS ID

NOTE: when I chose “All Events” Feb 19 2021, a message occurred that read “This request produces 15,924 rows, but 10,000 is the maximum allowed…” see below. If the 1% rule is applied, there may be another 1,576,476 un-reported adverse events. 
**Please see my EXCEL SPREADSHEET of the on-going results data collection. Last Updated 2.19.2021

From the United Kingdom Reporting System (weekly reports) COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis print Report
Run Date: 12-Feb-2021 Data Lock Date: 11-Feb-2021 19:00:03
All UK spontaneous reports received between Dec 12 2020 /20 and Feb 7 2021 CLICK HERE to view the entire Report

Total Number of 1st Dose: 17,723,840
Total Number of 2nd Dose: 624,325

See the Summary of all events HERE

COUNTRIES AND DOCTORS REJECT OR HAVE GREAT CONCERNS OVER THE CV-19 VACCINES

March 2 2021 – 3 Dead and 80% (26 out 35) of nuns vaccinated at Kentucky convent tested positive for coronavirus

Feb. 8, 2021 – South Africa Suspends Use of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine After It Fails to Clearly Stop Virus Variant 

Feb 6 2021 – India’s Expert Panel Rejects Pfizer’s Application For Covid-19 Vaccine 

January 25, 2021 – Merck Scraps COVID Vaccines — Says It’s More Effective To Get The Virus And Recover – or CLICK HERE from Merck

  • “Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today announced that the company is discontinuing development of its SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccine candidates, V590 and V591, and plans to focus its SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 research strategy and production capabilities on advancing two therapeutic candidates, MK-4482 and MK-7110. This decision follows Merck’s review of findings from Phase 1 clinical studies for the vaccines. In these studies, both V590 and V591 were generally well tolerated, but the immune responses were inferior to those seen following natural infection and those reported for other SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccines.”

Feb 5 2021 – Swiss say ’no’ to AstraZeneca vaccine, France and Germany restrict access

Great Barrington Declaration – authored by
Dr. Martin Kulldorff – Harvard Medical School Professor, Dr. Sunetra Gupta – Oxford University Epidemiology Professor, Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya – Stanford Epidemiology Professor.

  • “As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.”

Professor Dolores Cahill PhD, speaking about RNA vaccines: predicts impending mass death from RNA vaccines

Doctors for Truth: Tens of Thousands Medical Professionals Suing and Calling for End to COVID Tyranny

Nurse Speaks Out Against Covid and Files a Lawsuit

Dr. Simone Gold – The Truth About Covid-19 Vaccine

The UK Govt Admits That COVID Injections Are Basically Pointless Since They Offer No Protection Against Reinfection

NHS Admits Vaccine Does NOT Stop Transmission of SARS Cov2

Del Bigtree from The Highwire – Interview with Zach Bush, MD, board certified internist, endocrinologist and specialist in hospice care, discusses co-morbidities and the failure of the USA therapies that are harming COVID-19 patients.

Media Blackout: Moderna’s FDA Report Lists 13 Total Deaths, 6 In Vaccine Group, 7 In Placebo (video)

Discrepancies in Moderna’s FDA Report Demand Answers by James Lyons-Weiler, PhD

REPORTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD OF REACTIONS & DEATHS FROM COVID-19 VACCINE

Video below: Del Bigtree Interviews Dr. James Neuenschwander MD (Immune Dysfunction Expert) to discuss neurologic injury in some reported vaccine recipients and where to go if one is injured.

Informed Consent Action Network  and Covid-19 Vaccine Injury Reporting

TOPICS FOR CONCERN AND INQUIRY

History of Rushed Vaccines Not a Good Outcome for the Trust of People
“This could do substantial damage,” Kinch said. Kinch, who is a patient in one of the vaccine trials himself, said the clinical trial process needs to be followed to the end. A too-early EUA for a vaccine could cause a “nightmare scenario,” for a few reasons. One, the vaccine may not be safe. Two, if it is not safe, people will lose faith in vaccines. Three, if a vaccine doesn’t offer complete protection, people will have a false sense of security and increase their risk. Four, if a substandard vaccine gets an EUA, a better vaccine may never get approval, because people would be reluctant to enroll in trials and risk getting a placebo instead of a vaccine. “People are going to die unnecessarily if we take chances with this,” Kinch said. “We’ve got to get this right.”

USA Vaccine Effort Opts for Stadium Clinics Over Doctors’ Offices  –Are any of these unknowing trial participants getting the information they need for informed consent?

Why is the military involved?
Rollout of COVID-19 Vaccine Distribution Is Off to Successful Start, Officials Say
Military Prepares to Deploy Thousands of Active-Duty Troops to Help FEMA Deliver Vaccines

Why Are Doctors and Scientists Being Censored and vilified for wanting to open the debate of the harm of Lockdowns.

The video below reveals the disturbing, and dangerous, trend of how peaceful voices of frontline physicians who dissent, and disagree, with state policy regarding COVID directives, are being silenced. Dr. Gill, Dr. Phillips and Dr. Lamba have all come under attack for their expression that public health directives and mandates are grossly flawed and misguided, and for calling attention to the incredible harms of the governments’ forced lockdowns.

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

“The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.  This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body. This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided. This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients. The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.” - http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

THE GOOD NEWS! THERE ARE TREATMENTS FOR COVID-19

IVERMECTIN

Dr. Pierre Kory testifies to a US Senate Committee about IVERMECTIN SEE THE VIDEO TESTIMONY ON THE Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance WEBSITE , Dec. 8, 2020 – or on https://www.bitchute.com/video/RfhxT7ZlpenN/

  • “Appearing as a witness on Dec. 8, 2020, before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs—which held a hearing on “Early Outpatient Treatment: An Essential Part of a COVID-19 Solution”— Dr. Pierre Kory, President of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), called for the government to swiftly review the already expansive and still rapidly emerging medical evidence on Ivermectin. The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover. Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin is effectively a “miracle drug” against COVID-19 and called upon the government’s medical authorities—the NIH, CDC, and FDA—to urgently review the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician assistants to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID-19.”

One Page Summary of the Clinical Trials Evidence for Ivermectin in COVID-19 – FLCCC (Frontline Critical Care Alliance)

EVMS COVID-19 MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL (Ivermectin vs other treatments)
Developed and Updated by Paul Marik, MD, FCP (SA), FRCP (C), FCCP, FCCM.
Professor of Medicine, Chief of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School – Dec 27, 2020

Clinical and Scientific Rationale for the “MATH+” Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19
Pierre Kory, MD, MPA1 , G. Umberto Meduri, MD2, Jose Iglesias, DO3,Joseph Varon, MD4, and Paul E. Marik, MD5 –  or at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0885066620973585

For updates on the above protocol visit Frontline Covid Critical Care Alliance – https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Suppressed Covid- 19 Treatment Therapies That Have More Data from More Worldwide Studies than the Big-Pharma Vaccines – (so many studies they needed multiple websites to publish all the papers)

NIH (National Institutes of Health) on Ivermectin – COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines – last updated February 11, 2021 – 

Mass Treatment With Ivermectin: An Underutilized Public Health Strategy by Rick Speare & David Durrheim Bulletin of the World Health Organization Vol. 82: 2004

  • “Merck’s patent on ivermectin expired in 1996, though it was extended for different periods in various countries. Thus, other companies’ ivermectin preparations are now commercially available. Bioavailability of drugs depends on formulation and manufacturing processes, so the results obtained with the ivermectin manufactured by Merck may not apply to the new products. It is thus encouraging to see clinical trials evaluating new formulations of this valuable drug….It is time to capitalize on the full public health potential of ivermectin.”

HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE

Graph Showing Deaths of Countries using HQC (Hydroxychloroquine) early on vs. countries banning or limiting HQC for COVID19 therapy 

Epidemiologist At Yale Provides Testimony On Hydroxychloroquine For Treating COVID-19 – Dec 14 2020

Statement of Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD Professor of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health Nov 19 2020

Dr. Anthony Cardillo: Covid Symptoms Disappear Within 12 Hours After Prescribing HCQ & Zinc – Aug 1 2020

Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 in New York City June 30 2020

  • “Conclusions: Among patients with COVID-19, older age, male sex, hypotension, tachypnea, hypoxia, impaired renal function, elevated D-dimer, and elevated troponin were associated with increased in-hospital mortality and hydroxychloroquine use was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality.”

HCQ Breakthrough: ICMR Finds It’s Effective In Preventing Coronavirus, Expands its Use: Three Studies Find That Hydroxychloroquine Reduces Chances of Contracting COVID, So ICMR Allows More Frontline Workers To Take It As A Preventive Drug. Himani Chandna 22 May, 2020

Hydroxychloroquine: Dangerous drug or innocent victim? – James Todaro, MD August 6, 2020

COVID-19 Outpatients – Early Risk-Stratified Treatment with Zinc Plus Low Dose Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin: A Retrospective Case Series Study – 3 July 2020 or peer reviewed at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920304258

Coronavirus Treatment: Bangladesh Doctors Claim to Have Found Drug Combinations to Treat COVID-19 May 18 2020

Hydroxychloroquine works in high-risk patients, and saying otherwise is dangerous – Aug 12 2020

FLAWED PCR TEST DETERMING OUR FATES (FALSE POSITIVES AND NEGATIVES)

Now with so many countries requiring a Covid Neg. PCR test before getting on the plane, and some requiring it when you get of the plane (Canada), one has to wonder who makes these kits and how much money are they making from them, when from the beginning they were deemed as not a reliable way of detecting Sars-CoV-2.

External Peer Review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.

WHO Admits the PCR test results in too many false positives 

One Number Could Help Reveal How Infectious a COVID-19 Patient Is. Should Test Results Include It? by Robert F. Service Sep. 29, 2020 Science Magazine

  • “The CT value isn’t an absolute scale,” says Marta Gaglia, a virologist at Tufts University…In a study published this week in Clinical Infectious Diseases, researchers led by Bernard La Scola, an infectious diseases expert at IHU-Méditerranée Infection, examined 3790 positive samples with known CT values to see whether they harbored viable virus, indicating the patients were likely infectious. La Scola and his colleagues found that 70% of samples with CT values of 25 or below could be cultured, compared with less than 3% of the cases with CT values above 35. “It’s fair to say that having a higher viral load is associated with being more infectious,” says Monica Gandhi, an infectious diseases specialist at the University of California, San Francisco.”

Appropriate use of PCR needed for a focused response to the pandemic

  • “An article in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases found that among positive PCR samples with a cycle count over 35 – a common lab occurrence – only 3 percent of samples showed viral replication. Simply put, the cycle number next to the test is associated with the chances of infectiousness and should be available to the patient and the public. Thankfully, the WHO now explicitly recommends this.”

Lower Cases Imminent As WHO Drops The Charade Of Erroneous PCR Test Protocol

  • “In case of virus detection, >35 cycles only detects signals which do not correlate with infectious virus as determined by isolation in cell culture [reviewed in 2]; if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%”

College of American Pathologists (CAP) Microbiology Committee Perspective: Caution Must Be Used in Interpreting the Cycle Threshold (Ct) Value

PCR Inventor: “It doesn’t tell you that you are sick”

  • Dr Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR process, was clear that it wasn’t meant as a diagnostic tool, saying… “with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.” And, commenting on cycle thresholds, once said: “If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR. PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
  • note: The PCR kits instruct to use 30-35 CT. Canada was (may still be) using 45 cycle thresholds (CT). *ref. site still needed
Below is a graph from a study about CT numbers and their efficacy. Click on the image for the study. It’s very technical. This Video walks you through it at minute 9:46

A War On Information / Science Wars / Censored-Banned videos and information

MASKS

The Science of Facemasks – Dr. Lee Merritt

American Frontline Doctors “Masks: The Science & Myths” Oct 16 2020

New Danish Study Finds Masks Don’t Protect Wearers From COVID Infection

Kristen Meghan (Senior Industrial Hygienists) Reveals the BIG MASK LIE being pushed by Fauci and the media – (VIDEO)

Public Health Measures like Mask Mandates Lead to Unintended and Unpredictable Outcomes Feb 11 2021

STUDY: Corona children studies “Co-Ki”: First results of a Germany-wide registry on mouth and nose covering (mask) in children

  • “By 26.10.2020 the registry had been used by 20,353 people. In this publication we report the results from the parents, who entered data on a total of 25,930 children. The average wearing time of the mask was 270 minutes per day. Impairments caused by wearing the mask were reported by 68% of the parents. These included irritability (60%), headache (53%), difficulty concentrating (50%), less happiness (49%), reluctance to go to school/kindergarten (44%), malaise (42%) impaired learning (38%) and drowsiness or fatigue (37%).”

Mask mouth causes gum disease, which increases coronavirus death risk by 900% 

  • “The study included 568 patients from Qatar who were diagnosed with the China Flu … Of these, 40 had “complications,” including admission to the ICU, being placed on a ventilator, or death….In the end, patients with gum disease were found to have an 8.81 times higher risk of death than the others. “

TRUTH ABOUT MASKS “Surgical masks were used as torture tools at the notorious Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba.”

HUMAN RIGHTS FREEDOM VIOLATIONS AND LOCKDOWNS RAMIFICATIONS

Canada is at risk of joining the world’s most repressive regimes in intolerance for free speech Feb 17th, 2021 By John Carpay, The Post Millennia 

WHO Covid expert: Lockdowns can only delay virus infections | SpectatorTV – Oct. 9 2020 

  • “Professor David Nabarro, World Health Organization special envoy on Covid-19, tells Andrew Neil that lockdowns should not be the primary means of controlling coronavirus. He argues that closing down economies and introducing social restrictions are only useful to buy governments time to improve testing, treatment methods and organization.”

Your Freedom Will Not Change Even With The Vaccine 

The Lawsuit That Could End Covid-1984 with Dr. Pam Popper

 INTERVIEW with John Carpay 

  • (in Canada) The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is filing court actions in five provinces to end the Charter-violating lockdowns

Understanding Your Fundamental Rights and Freedoms In A World Filled With Fear

COVID Restrictions Are The Most Severe Violation Of Human Rights Canadians Have Faced And It’s Time To Fight Back – Feb 1st, 2021 

Lockdowns are Harmful To Human Health, they don’t work, and are illegal

Mike Green from Real Vision interviews Nick Hudson, CEO of Sana Partners, and Russell Lamberti, Founder of ETM Macro Advisors, are part of Pandemics Data and Analytics, or PANDA, (www.pandata.org) a collective of leading scientists, actuaries, economists, data scientists, statisticians, medical professionals, lawyers, engineers and businesspeople working to challenge the mainstream narrative around lockdowns using scientific evidence. www.realvision.com

“CONSPIRACIES” THAT ARE NOT CONSPIRACIES

60 Minutes “The Swine Flu Fraud of 1976

The Future of Vaccines by James Corbett – 12/23/2020

Plandemic: Indoctornation The Most Censored Documentary in History https://www.indoctornation.com/ 

Who Is Bill Gates (a 2 hour documentary)

Event201

  • “Event 201 (happened Friday, October 18, 2019) was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. …. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose a call to action for Public-private cooperation for pandemic preparedness and response“ https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about AND CLICK AND WATCH THEIR VIDEOS! 

FINANCIAL RAMIFICATIONS

*this section is still being populated with content

The Long-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Unemployment Shock on Life Expectancy and Mortality Rates
Francesco Bianchi, Giada Bianchi & Dongho Song (National Bureau of Economic Research)

  • “As a result, the impact of the COVID-19 unemployment shock on the death rate is large for all groups, but visibly larger for African-Americans and White women … For the overall population, the increase in the death rate following the COVID-19 pandemic implies staggering 0.84 and 1.22 million excess deaths over the next 15 and 20 years, respectively. These numbers correspond to 0.23% and 0.33% of the projected US population at the 15- and 20-year horizons, respectively. For African-Americans, we estimate 200 thousand and 290 thousand excess deaths over the next 15 and 20 years, respectively. These numbers correspond to 0.38% and 0.52% of the projected African-American population at the 15- and 20-year horizons, respectively. For Whites, we estimate 0.76 and 1.09 million excess deaths over the next 15 and 20 years, respectively. These numbers correspond to 0.28% and 0.40% of the projected White population at the 15- and 20-year
    horizons, respectively.”

HOPE AND ACTIVISM

EVENT2020  and for resources https://event202.org/resources/

White Coat Summit Video Press Conference 

*this section is still being populated with content

 

Close Menu
×
×

Cart